Thursday, February 11, 2010

Why does Husserl split consciousness into Noesis and Noema?

I see he does it--





but why does he do it to begin with?





Is it because those are the building blocks of consciousness?





I am a little confused, any insights?Why does Husserl split consciousness into Noesis and Noema?
Pure Ego is Plotinian One Mind Soul and One Mind Soul-individuation.





A single distinction within One Mind Soul-individuation is that of Mind, the noetic, regarding physis, or the noema. Soul, individuating, re-cognizes or thinks Mind-thought re physis, noema.





Consciousness in Vipassana meditation is similar to Husserlian phenomenology: a rising or harmonizing within protocols insuring purity of awareness, toward types of subject-object unity. At level of Buddha Mind, at level of Atman, at level of One Mind Soul-individuation, at level of Pure Ego, there obtains certain multiplicities within Unity.





Outpicturing subject-object awareness, lessening of Vipassana awareness, descending the Jacobean ladder of Immanuel or Wittgenstein's ladder re world as case, is the case for human (Heideggerian Daseinic) awareness: at this level of metaphysics, the Kantian synthetic a priori of subject-object has formed, as existing outside of the more fluidic aspect of the One. In order to do business, Husserl described this synthetic a priority within the frame of his post-Kantian ';future metaphysics';--in which Noesis and Noema categorize Mindfulness qua Pure Ego, and the lesser, Kantian 5-sense data stream subject-object. This is similar to the frame of Whitehead's Monad-Dyad-Triad process, in which Monadic Pure Ego projects Dyad into physis, with some distinct hope of Triadic sublimation or increase of Monadic Nb that Hegel's critique of Kant: that Kierkegaard didn't go far enough with his awareness--is answered by Husserl in this wise.





';A Philosophy of Universality,'; O. M. Aivanhov,


';Nihilism,'; Father Seraphim Rose, and


';Philosophy as Metanoetics,'; Tanabe (student of Husserl and Heidegger), and


';The Path of the Higher Self,'; Mark Prophet, deal with this in varying modes.





Reviews at http://www.amazon.com

No comments:

Post a Comment